ext_132564 ([identity profile] questails.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] twopoint 2009-08-12 02:12 am (UTC)

Then I shall give both, but I don't tell you which is which!

ANSWER THE ONE: Having now read a not-insubstantial amount of your fic, I can use any one of several methods of statistical analysis to show, with better than 99.8% certainty, that you aren't capable of posting something worthy of.... you know.... when reading it later. (I also despise doing... that, so I know what you mean.). Therefore you don't have to worry about it.

ANSWER THE OTHER: It's a trick question with no real answer; because the only vantage point from which you can look back on a work with complete satisfaction is that of a better one. E.g., you re-read something from ten years ago or yesterday; and you can look on it kindly because you learned from its flaws and wrote something better. It was a stepping stone, and as such, you feel like you've gone forward and no longer want to... you know... over those errors or weaknesses.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting